Page 96 of 181

Re: February Weather. Arctic Blast/Snow/Then More Arctic Co

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:02 am
by srainhoutx
Candy Cane wrote:Looks like we may see some small breaks in the clouds. That might get us to above freezing this afternoon, but I still think the chances of that are small.
The clouds are moving in rather quickly. I feel comfortable that we will not get above freezing across the Northern half of the region. 19.4F here at this time.

Re: February Weather. Arctic Blast/Snow/Then More Arctic Co

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:05 am
by ronyan
Low temperature this morning was 23.9 F. It's now only 25.3 F.

Re: February Weather. Arctic Blast/Snow/Then More Arctic Co

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:07 am
by Wendy 90
Flurries in the air in College Station. It's ever so slight, but they were there when I left the gym this morning.

Re: February Weather. Arctic Blast/Snow/Then More Arctic Co

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:07 am
by Mr. T
Ed Mahmoud wrote:Whatever 'banding' that is so clearly shown from the 'dynamics' on the NAM, they happen East of here, verbatim.

Its just the NAM. Its been the driest of the models, and I'm just reporting what it shows, and it shows an unimpressive inch of not very well developed crystals.

Don't be hating the messenger. I don't think the NWS was talking about the NAM. The wettest model has been the Canadian, and the Euro has been decent as well.

And I'm discussing the NAM because its the first model out.
We'll be eagerly awaiting your analysis of the GFS

Re: February Weather. Arctic Blast/Snow/Then More Arctic Co

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:12 am
by srainhoutx
Mr. T wrote:
Ed Mahmoud wrote:Whatever 'banding' that is so clearly shown from the 'dynamics' on the NAM, they happen East of here, verbatim.

Its just the NAM. Its been the driest of the models, and I'm just reporting what it shows, and it shows an unimpressive inch of not very well developed crystals.

Don't be hating the messenger. I don't think the NWS was talking about the NAM. The wettest model has been the Canadian, and the Euro has been decent as well.

And I'm discussing the NAM because its the first model out.
We'll be eagerly awaiting your analysis of the GFS
Perhaps Fred Gossage will join in...

Re: February Weather. Arctic Blast/Snow/Then More Arctic Co

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:16 am
by southerngale
Candy Cane wrote:My friend at HGX texted me the following:

"I will issue a Winter Storm Watch for the entire CWA this afternoon if and only if the surrounding offices pull the trigger with me."
NWS LCH is being very conservative, IMO, so good luck with that. They have been much too warm so far as well.

Last night's forecast low was 24° and it got to 18° and currently sitting at 19°. What bugged me is they didn't even lower the forecast lows in their evening update when we were already below the forecast low. Local TV stations adjusted their lows for the 10pm news because the area was already below, or near, the original ones.

NWS LCH has today's high as 41°. Perhaps they'll be right, but I have my doubts about it getting that high.

Re: February Weather. Arctic Blast/Snow/Then More Arctic Co

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:16 am
by TexasMetBlake
Mr. T wrote:
Ed Mahmoud wrote:Whatever 'banding' that is so clearly shown from the 'dynamics' on the NAM, they happen East of here, verbatim.

Its just the NAM. Its been the driest of the models, and I'm just reporting what it shows, and it shows an unimpressive inch of not very well developed crystals.

Don't be hating the messenger. I don't think the NWS was talking about the NAM. The wettest model has been the Canadian, and the Euro has been decent as well.

And I'm discussing the NAM because its the first model out.
We'll be eagerly awaiting your analysis of the GFS
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: February Weather. Arctic Blast/Snow/Then More Arctic Co

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:17 am
by TexasMetBlake
southerngale wrote:
Candy Cane wrote:My friend at HGX texted me the following:

"I will issue a Winter Storm Watch for the entire CWA this afternoon if and only if the surrounding offices pull the trigger with me."
NWS LCH is being very conservative, IMO, so good luck with that. They have been much too warm so far as well.

Last night's forecast low was 24° and it got to 18° and currently sitting at 19°. What bugged me is they didn't even lower the forecast lows in their evening update when we were already below the forecast low. Local TV stations adjusted their lows for the 10pm news because the area was already below, or near, the original ones.

NWS LCH has today's high as 41°. Perhaps they'll be right, but I have my doubts about it getting that high.
He was referring to Austin and Corpus I believe.

Re: February Weather. Arctic Blast/Snow/Then More Arctic Co

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:18 am
by tireman4
Candy Cane,

So why wait until the other "pull the trigger"? Do they not have their (HGX) information to go on? Maybe I am dense on this Wednesday morning.

Re: February Weather. Arctic Blast/Snow/Then More Arctic Co

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:20 am
by TexasMetBlake
tireman4 wrote:Candy Cane,

So why wait until the other "pull the trigger"? Do they not have their (HGX) information to go on? Maybe I am dense on this Wednesday morning.
Mainly because of timing. They are not obligated to issue a watch until Thursday morning. They were thinking of doing it early to give people a chance to prepare. The hold is NOT because of uncertainty in the snowfall forecast. It will snow.

Re: February Weather. Arctic Blast/Snow/Then More Arctic Co

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:21 am
by Baseballdude2915
NWS still giving me 1-2 inches for thursday night and 1-2 additional inches for Friday.
Bold forecast, a WSA makes since if they have numbers that high. But i dont expect half that amount of snow.

Re: February Weather. Arctic Blast/Snow/Then More Arctic Co

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:22 am
by southerngale
Candy Cane wrote:He was referring to Austin and Corpus I believe.
Ah, ok. I know that HOU and LCH coordinate often, so I assumed he meant LCH as well.

Re: February Weather. Arctic Blast/Snow/Then More Arctic Co

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:26 am
by tireman4
Candy Cane wrote:
tireman4 wrote:Candy Cane,

So why wait until the other "pull the trigger"? Do they not have their (HGX) information to go on? Maybe I am dense on this Wednesday morning.
Mainly because of timing. They are not obligated to issue a watch until Thursday morning. They were thinking of doing it early to give people a chance to prepare. The hold is NOT because of uncertainty in the snowfall forecast. It will snow.
Ahh...that is what I was thinking. I was thinking they would hold off until Thursday morning...

Re: February Weather. Arctic Blast/Snow/Then More Arctic Co

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:27 am
by srainhoutx
The Canadian short range RGEM suggests snow across Houston area...

Re: February Weather. Arctic Blast/Snow/Then More Arctic Co

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:28 am
by djmike

Re: February Weather. Arctic Blast/Snow/Then More Arctic Co

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:30 am
by redneckweather
Boy howdy, this has got to be our colderst airmass since '89! Weatherbug has me at 16.1 degrees this morning with the wind chill waffling back between -3 to 3 above zero! I'm loving it! It's now a warm 18 degrees with wind chills coming in between 3 to 8 above zero. If clouds stay in place, I don't see us getting out of the mid 20's where I am.

Re: February Weather. Arctic Blast/Snow/Then More Arctic Co

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:30 am
by Portastorm
Sitting at 18 degrees at the Portastorm Weather Center in SW Austin under a thickening (cold) blanket of clouds. Rolling blackouts across the city here creating some traffic havoc not to mention the inconveniences of getting ready for work in the dark. Electricity, it's a beautiful thing when you have it.

NWS says 1/2 to 3/4 inch of snow only for AUS by Friday afternoon. Hope they're underestimating. 6z model trends are hopeful.

Re: February Weather. Arctic Blast/Snow/Then More Arctic Co

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:32 am
by TexasBreeze
Oh I thought the timing was 48 hours in advance. I saw the Thurs morning reference in the statement they issued.

Re: February Weather. Arctic Blast/Snow/Then More Arctic Co

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:34 am
by tireman4
I was under the belief that is was 36-48 hours out....but I could be wrong ( Timing on Watches and Warnings from the NWS)

Re: February Weather. Arctic Blast/Snow/Then More Arctic Co

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:46 am
by srainhoutx
Our friends at Impact Weather have updated their video just now. Enjoy...

http://www.youtube.com/impactweather